Features
Built around how voir dire actually happens.
A full suite in one workflow: organization, data, multi-metric scoring against your own avatar jurors, live guidance and post-selection insight. Each piece was designed at counsel table, for the pace and pressure of a real jury selection.
Case setup and organization
Charges, side, themes and criteria in one place, reusable across the matters you try most.
Juror entry and management
Type, import or photograph the list. Seats, alternates and questionnaires stay attached.
AI-assisted juror insights
Plain-language summaries of what a profile suggests for your case, with the source behind each point.
Public-records collection
Voter, court, property and public social content gathered per juror with match confidence.
Juror scoring
Scores tuned to your side and updated as answers come in, with the factors always visible.
Consistent criteria, side by side
The same standard for every juror, and a comparison view for when you must choose between two.
Whisper Mode
Live in-trial insight that knows your case and your panel and waits until you look.
Trial-time workflow support
Challenge tracking for both sides, contemporaneous strike reasons and a post-selection strategy memo.
Ongoing product updates
New capabilities ship regularly and are included in every purchase, documented in the Help Center.
Case setup and organization
Start with the case, not the jurors.
The criteria that make a juror favorable in a self-defense case are not the ones that matter in a contract dispute. StrikeList AI asks you to write those down first, in plain language, so every later step is anchored to this trial.
- Charges or claims, your side and the themes you intend to run
- Case-specific juror criteria with the weight you choose
- Your keep avatar and strike avatar: the juror you want and the juror you do not, described in plain language
- Templates for recurring case types, editable per matter
- Team access so a second chair or paralegal can prepare with you
- +Skeptical of single-witness identificationTheme: mistaken identityHigh
- +Experience with a rushed or incomplete investigationTheme: what the police did not doHigh
- +Comfortable holding the State to its burdenTheme: reasonable doubtMed
- −Close ties to law enforcementWatch for: officer-credibility deferenceHigh
- −Prior victim of a similar offenseExplore, do not assumeMed
Illustration of the workflow, not a product screenshot.
Juror entry and management
Get the venire in without the typing.
Jury lists arrive as a printout at 8:45 in the morning. Photograph it and StrikeList AI extracts names and seat numbers. Questionnaires, when you have them, attach to the juror they belong to.
- Photo or upload extraction of the printed jury list
- Six- and twelve-person configurations with alternates
- Seating chart that follows the panel as jurors are excused and replaced
- Manual entry when that is simply faster
- ✓Voter registrationCounty match · Address consistent with listHigh
- ✓Property recordOwner since 2016High
- ✓Civil case, 2021Plaintiff · landlord disputeMed
- ?Public social profileName match only · review before relyingLow
Has been a plaintiff in a civil matter and may be comfortable with the courtroom. The landlord dispute suggests some willingness to challenge an institution. No indicators found on the law-enforcement criterion.
Illustration of the workflow, not a product screenshot. Juror details are fictional.
Public-records collection
The research you would do if you had a week, done before the panel is called.
StrikeList AI gathers publicly available records and public social content for each juror and organizes them into a single profile. Every item shows its source and how confident the identity match is. Nothing is merged silently, and nothing involves contacting a juror.
Voter registration
Registration status and public party affiliation where the state makes it public.
Court records
Prior civil or criminal matters where the juror appears as a party, from public dockets.
Property and residence
Ownership and address consistency, used mainly to confirm identity.
Public social content
Publicly posted content summarized with the source preserved, never accessed through a request or connection.
Availability of specific record types varies by state and county. StrikeList AI collects only information that is publicly available and does not contact, follow, friend or otherwise communicate with any juror. Attorneys remain responsible for compliance with the rules on juror research in their jurisdiction.
Juror scoring and consistent criteria
Multiple metrics, your avatars, one consistent standard.
Every juror is scored on several algorithms at once and against the keep and strike avatars you described for this case. Scores are color-coded so the panel reads at a glance, they show the factors behind them, and they update the moment public data arrives or a teammate enters a note from voir dire.
- Scores across multiple metrics, tuned to your side and your theory of the case
- A match score against your keep avatar and your strike avatar
- Flags that appear when new data or a new note changes the picture
- Each score expands to show which criteria moved it and why
- Side-by-side comparison for the moment you must pick between two strikes
- Live updates as voir dire answers are entered
- −Law-enforcement tiesSpouse is a retired officer−2.4
- −ID skepticism"Eyewitnesses are usually right"−1.6
- +Burden of proofAgreed presumption of innocence matters+0.8
- +ID skepticismDescribed mistaking a stranger for a friend+1.9
- +Investigation experienceUnsolved car theft, 2022+1.2
- ·Law-enforcement tiesNone found0.0
Illustration of the workflow, not a product screenshot. Juror details are fictional.
Whisper Mode
Live insight during voir dire, without losing the room.
You take short notes as jurors answer. Whisper Mode reads each note against the case, the criteria and the juror's profile, and responds quietly with what a prepared second chair would lean over and say.
- Follow-up questions tied to the specific answer that prompted them
- Potential cause issues, with the statement to cite when you raise them
- Reminders of profile facts that bear on what a juror just said
- No alerts or interruptions. It waits until you look
"Works nights as an ER nurse. Said she 'sees what happens' when people get hurt. Nodded a lot during the judge's instructions."
Her profile shows twelve years in emergency medicine. She is likely comfortable with graphic evidence and may hold the State to its medical proof. Watch for sympathy toward the complaining witness; one question can separate the two.
Trial-time workflow support
Your record, built while you decide.
Every peremptory and cause challenge is tracked for both sides. When you strike, StrikeList AI asks for the reason in one line and keeps it with the juror. If your strikes are ever questioned, your contemporaneous reasons are already written down.
- Peremptory and cause tracking for your side and theirs
- Batson record: strike reasons captured at the time you exercise them
- Cause-challenge documentation with the juror's own statements
- Post-selection strategy memo connecting the seated jury to your themes
- 3Juror 3Spouse retired officer; stated eyewitnesses "usually right"Strike
- 8Juror 8Victim of similar offense; said it would be "hard" to be fairStrike
- 10Juror 10Stated defendant "must have done something"Cause · granted
- 4Juror 4Follow-up asked; answered neutrallySeat
Illustration of the workflow, not a product screenshot. Juror details are fictional.
Ongoing product updates
It keeps getting better between your trials.
StrikeList AI is built by a trial lawyer who uses it. New capabilities ship regularly, every release is documented in the Help Center, and updates are included with every purchase.
Help Center
Written how-tos and short video walkthroughs for every feature, kept current with each release.
Release notes
Plain-language notes on what changed and how it affects your workflow.
Direct support
Email support with a person who has tried cases, prioritized during your trial weeks.
Your feedback, built in
Feature requests come from the courtroom. Many of them ship.
AI, public records, and your judgment
The lawyer decides. StrikeList AI makes sure the lawyer is informed.
Every score, flag and suggestion is built from information you can see and criteria you set. Nothing is hidden, nothing is automatic, and no output tells you what a juror will do.
Transparent inputs
Each juror's profile shows what was found, where it came from, and how confident the match is.
Criteria you control
Scores follow the case-specific criteria you define, applied the same way to every juror in the box.
Public information only
Collection is limited to publicly available records and public social content. No contact with jurors, ever.
A record of your reasons
Strike and cause notes are captured as you make them, so your reasoning is documented if it is ever questioned.