Week of November 8, 2026: Juror Research, Software Testing, and AI Flag Accountability

This week's episode covers three posts on voir dire practice and jury selection technology.

Live Juror Research During Voir Dire: When to Search, When to Stop, and What to Tell the Judge — This post argues that real-time juror research must follow a strict protocol of passive searching, verification, a defined stopping point, and timely disclosure to the court before the panel is sworn — https://www.strikelistai.com/blog/live-juror-research-during-voir-dire-when-to-search-when-to-stop-and-what-to-tell-the-judge/

Jury Selection Software Trial Run: A 30-Minute Test Before You Buy — This post argues that firms should test jury selection software with a messy mock panel covering import, seating, flagging, recovery, and export before purchasing, since those are the points most likely to fail under real courtroom pressure — https://www.strikelistai.com/blog/jury-selection-software-trial-run-a-30-minute-test-before-you-buy/

The AI Juror-Rating Audit: Seven Questions Before You Trust a Flag — This post argues that an AI-generated juror flag is only a lead, not evidence, and lawyers must audit its provenance, currency, inference versus fact, uncertainty, auditability, overridability, and courtroom defensibility before relying on it to strike a juror — https://www.strikelistai.com/blog/the-ai-juror-rating-audit-seven-questions-before-you-trust-a-flag/