This week we cover juror rehabilitation scripts, punishment attitudes in non-capital cases, and what AI jury selection tools can really do.
Rehabilitating a Juror After a Damaging Answer: A Step-by-Step Script — It provides a mirror-scope-commit rehabilitation sequence attorneys can use after a juror reveals bias, along with tactics for handling judge pushback and preserving the record for cause challenges and appeal — https://www.strikelistai.com/blog/rehabilitating-a-juror-after-a-damaging-answer-a-step-by-step-script/
Death Qualification in Non-Capital Cases: When Life-and-Death Attitudes Still Matter — It argues that although formal death qualification doctrine applies only to capital trials, attitudes about punishment severity still distort juror judgment in felony-murder and attempted-murder cases, and offers functional, punishment-neutral questions to surface that bias without invoking Witherspoon claims — https://www.strikelistai.com/blog/death-qualification-in-non-capital-cases-when-life-and-death-attitudes-still-matter/
AI Jury Selection Software Explained: What It Can—and Cannot—Tell Trial Lawyers — It breaks down the four-stage workflow behind AI jury selection tools and argues these products can organize data and flag risk factors but cannot predict juror votes or replace attorney judgment, offering a red-flags checklist for buyers concerned about explainability and Batson exposure — https://www.strikelistai.com/blog/ai-jury-selection-software-explained-what-it-can-and-cannot-tell-trial-lawyers/
See how StrikeList AI fits your next trial.
Buy a single trial and start today, or request a short demo to see the workflow on a real panel.